4.3 Types of Fit Testing
Fit Testing Evidence
The UKHCA guidance outlines several methods for fit testing hearing protection.
Primary guidance: UKHCA Hearing Protection Fit Testing — An Introductory Guide (BOHS):
Types of Hearing Protection Fit Testing
Hearing protection fit testing checks whether a specific hearing protector (usually earplugs) is delivering the expected level of attenuation for the individual wearer. Different ear canals, fitting technique, comfort, and training all affect real-world protection — so two people wearing the same plug can get very different results.
In the UK, the most commonly referenced fit testing approaches include F-MIRE and audiometric fit testing, because they provide a quantitative Personal Attenuation Rating (PAR).
Subjective Fit Testing (Measured PAR)
Subjective fit testing provides a numerical result (PAR) showing how much protection the wearer is actually achieving with that specific hearing protector.
What it’s useful for
Verifying protection for higher-risk roles and noisy environments
Demonstrating “fit achieved” after training or coaching
Comparing different earplug types/sizes to find the best real-world result
Building clear records and evidence for hearing protection programmes
What it doesn’t do
It doesn’t guarantee the wearer will fit the plug correctly every day without training/supervision
Objective Fit Testing (Measured PAR)
F-MIRE typically uses a probe microphone setup to measure sound levels and estimate the attenuation achieved with the hearing protection in place. It outputs a result (PAR).
Typical outcomes
You identify poor insertion quickly
Coaching + re-test shows improvement
You can select a better plug type/size based on measured results
Audiometric fit testing
Audiometric fit testing uses a hearing-test style method to determine attenuation using tones, producing a PAR. It can be useful where the testing approach aligns with audiometric style measurement and you want a clear numerical result.
Web Based Fit Testing
Web based fit testing does not rely on audiometric thresholds and is therefore more accessible
Acoustic Leak Testing
Acoustic Leak Testing establishes that the mould protection fits correctly but does not produce a PAR
Which method should you choose?
Most employers choose a method based on:
risk level and noise exposure
workforce size and logistics
need for records (PAR)
training requirements and consistency
ease of repeat testing
If you’re unsure, start with the goal: Do you need a measured PAR, or is Acoustic Leak Test sufficient for your program.
Related entries
What is Hearing Protection Fit Testing? (overview + why it matters)
Audiometric Fit Testing (deep dive)
PAR — Personal Attenuation Rating (what the number means)
Reference
UKHCA Hearing Protection Fit Testing — An Introductory Guide (BOHS PDF):https://www.bohs.org/app/uploads/2022/02/UKHCA-Hearing-Protection-Fit-Testing-%E2%80%94-An-Introductory-Guide.pdf
